Meerkats AI
Use cases

AI agents doing real work, reliably.

Three workflows our customers run on Meerkats. We keep their names private and show you what each agent had to know before it could act, the rules it works inside, who can change what, and the record every run leaves.

A clinic group runs lead follow-up with an AI agent that books appointments inside its rules.

Enquiries arrive from Google and Meta ads through forms and WhatsApp. Before, they were assigned from a spreadsheet the next morning and many never got a first call. Now an agent replies with open slots, confirms the booking and hands the lead to a consultant. It works inside rules the group set once, it can only act through a short list of allowed actions, and every booking has a record.

A clinic group · 3 locations · 2 programmes · one workflow
Read the use case →
A personal-care brand runs Amazon and Flipkart ads with AI agents that know its numbers and its limits.

Three platforms, three definitions of the same metric, three restatement windows. Reports were pasted into spreadsheets and questions were answered a day late. Now agents run pacing, competitor prices and the weekly search-term review on one catalog, tied to listings and stock. They recommend changes within caps the brand set, a media buyer approves, and every change is recorded with its sources.

A personal-care brand · Amazon, Flipkart and Meta · one metric catalog
Read the use case →
A skincare brand already had the data stack. Now its AI agents read it, and scale or pause campaigns inside its rules.

The brand had done the data work: a warehouse with dbt models, a semantic layer with the KPI definitions finance signed off, dashboards everyone trusted. Its AI agents read none of it. They called the ad platforms directly, judged campaigns on platform ROAS, and suggested changes nobody dared apply. We built the context layer on the stack they already had, without redefining a metric, and added the pieces that were missing. Now an agent tells profitable campaigns apart by finance's definition and scales or pauses them inside rules the growth lead set.

A D2C skincare brand · warehouse, dbt and a semantic layer already in place · one workflow
Read the use case →
What they share

Different work. The same way of making agents reliable.

What the agent must know is written down

A short list per workflow: which information to trust, what the terms mean, which rules apply, what it may do. The agent becomes reliable once that list exists.

One definition per metric and entity

The catalog is the single name authority. Every agent, workflow and report uses the same meaning, so nobody reconciles numbers.

Context loaded, not rebuilt

Each run reads the timeline, the state and the rules from the context layer. The model never sees raw rows, so runs are cheap and the same every time.

Actions from a registry, within limits

Every write is a registered, permissioned operation with a cap, a verify read and a rollback. Nothing else can write.

A person on anything that isn't low-risk and reversible

Those actions run alone. Everything else stages a plan with its evidence and waits.

A record of every run

Inputs with sync time, the rule, the plan, the approver, the change, the read-back, and the outcome afterwards. Open any run.

Bring us one workflow. We’ll start there.

We connect the systems you already run, write down what the agent must know before it acts, and start with recommendations before actions. The next workflow reuses what the first one built.